Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas

Showing 732

MQ performance on RHEL8 with fapolicyd enabled

After going to RHEL8 we had to enable fapolicyd due to security/STIG requirements fapolcyd is enabled in permissive mode which is non-enforcing. We see significant slowdown in throughput when fapolciyd is enabled. Would like to see performance rep...
about 2 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Cluster Monitoring Program AMQSCLM to support CLUSNL as well

Cluster Monitoring currently works only if a cluster queue belong to only one cluster. Working Scenario: Cluster queue defined using CLUSTER Param When we use amqsclm, the cluster monitor on a cluster queue which is a part of only one cluster it w...
about 2 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

In IBMMQ V9.3 you removed the Widget based Web Console, we and many other customers use and rely on its functionality to provide enterprise monitoring and statistics metrics, please re-instate in future versions

It provided monitoring capability not provided by any other of your product range and we rely upon it to provide monitoring and stats, as do many other customers.A terrible step backwards !
2 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Provide aliases of SSL related attributes in runmqsc

Existing runmqsc commands for channels with TLS parameters (SSLCIPH, SSLPEER etc) lead to cognative dissonance as they no longer control SSL, but rather TLS. The documentation and GUI (MQ Explorer and MQ Console) have updated the names of these fi...
3 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Request to log more details whenever MQ Multi-instance QueueManagers fails with NFS glitches.

In our environment MQ Multi-instances have been configured with NFS (eNAS/NetApp), As MQ is sensitive with the network glitches/drops. We see often failovers of MQ Queue managers from active to standby. Current Challenge: While IBM MQ does provide...
3 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

IBM VM Manager integration with Nutanix Prism Central V3 and above

IBM VM Manager integration with Nutanix Prism Central V3 and above, as its currently has an integration with Nutanix V2 only
3 months ago in IBM License Metric Tool (ILMT) 1 Not under consideration

RDQM: floating IP

Can the rdqmint command accept hostname defined in /etc/hosts when adding new IP? I know sometimes it won't work, but it is customer's responsibility to make the hostname correct, like in the same subnet, reachable IP, etc. By doing this way, it m...
3 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Integration issue between Datapower (model IDGX2, physical device, firmware version IDG.10.5.0.5) and OKTA

We learnt that OKTA supports TLS 1.3 & 1.2 - where as our datapower configuration set up supports TLS 1.2 only, whereas TLS 1.3 is partially supported Supported by OKTA : ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 Supported/added in datapower : ECDHE_RSA_WIT...
3 months ago in DataPower Gateway 2 Not under consideration

Please have the GCM Cipher Key Resets managed server side in TLS1.2

For governance to control the risk , this will benefit all clients which current don't support doing it (Java/JMS/.NT..etc). It should be configurable via MQ that if a certain size is exchanged without a TLS key reset done by the client then the s...
3 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Simplify the reporting and management of cve's, fix packs and patches for MQ.

Is there a solution similar to IBM WebSphere Automation (WSA) on the horizon for IBM MQ? Especially for operating a large MQ fleet across different hosting platforms, there is need of a capability/product to proactively report on security risks an...
3 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration