This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Hello,
Kafka events can sometimes carry sensitive data that is either subjected to the RGPD, banking security or of hight confidentiality.
We would like to have the possibility to add flags in schemas for sensible fields, or flag the entirety of an event schema as sensible, thus enforcing automated encryption of the sensible part of the data when the event is written by the consumer, and automated decryption by the allowed consumers and only them.
The goal is to prevent possible leaks of sensible data from users with admin/display rights that could examine the content of events directly on the kafka brokers.
Thank you for considering this suggestion if you can
Idea priority | Low |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Hello,
message-level encryption would be a good start, but in our use cases selective field-level encryption would be favored in the long term.
On a similar use case, automated selective redaction/anonymisation of some fields would become an useful feature.
Regards,
Hi Eric,
Thank you for raising this idea. Encryption is an interesting topic that has been raised by other customers, each with a different use case in mind.
Could you share a little bit more about your specific use case? and are you looking for field level / message level encryption?