This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
I see this as very important and indeed urgent.
The effective client channel capacity of z/OS QMs is very low compared to the LUW product.
For the most expensive and prestigious version of MQ - this is not acceptable.
Please also provide this to retrofit on MQ v9.2 LTS
This is definitely needed so that more channels can be supported, especially in the event that some members of a QSG fail and all the workload moves onto fewer QMs.
It would also help for z/OS to have a feature similar to uniform clustering in terms of re-balancing client connections once failed QMs came back up.
This RFE fits with our future plans for the chinit.
Yes, we want to. It is a good idea to have a choice to take the buffer high or not.
Detlef