Skip to Main Content

This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 18, 2019

+CSQX037E -MS1A CSQXRCTL Unable to get message from SGMEM1L1TW_QM.UAT, MQCC=2 MQRC=2342 (MQRC_DB2_NOT_AVAILABLE)

At present, an active and working Db2 is a firm requirement for correct
use and operation of shared channels and can be viewed as an essential
pre-requisite in the same way that TCP/IP might be and as such the
product has been architected with this assumption in mind.

That said, we are aware of the requirement to remove the dependency on
Db2 as a pre-requisite for shared queues and this is still under
consideration for future releases of MQ.

For this particular issue with retry on shared channels, I have
discussed this with development and they recommend that the customer
raise an RFE specifically for this issue it may be a more easily
achievable improvement short of the full Db2-removal requirement.

Idea priority Medium
RFE ID 133922
RFE Product IBM MQ
  • Admin
    Mark Taylor
    Jun 25, 2021

    We recognise that this is a valid requirement. However it doesn't fit with our delivery plans for the next couple of years.
    As a result we are declining this RFE. While declined the RFE can still be voted, and commented, upon. Declined RFEs can be reopened after one year, so if you would still like this function after a year you can reopen the RFE and we will reconsider it.