Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Workspace MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 25, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Add an option the DLH to print/describe what rule was used to process a message

Today, the DLH processes messages using a rules table, which can contain many entries.  It would be very helpful to have an option that could be used to externalize which rule was used to process a message or messages.  This would be a switch/option that could be specified if this level of details was required.

Idea priority Medium
  • Admin
    Mark Taylor
    Reply
    |     Jun 25, 2024

    While this is a reasonable suggestion it does not align with current product development priorities so is unlikely to be implemented in the near future. As an immediate solution, we would recommend tailoring the sample version of the handler to your specific needs: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-mq/latest?topic=handler-sample-dlq-amqsdlq

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.