This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
At one point I was testing a distributed lock using etcd. That is, wrapping the qmgr start up with a script to check etc for locks for that instance. The qmgr would only start if it was able to obtain the lock. If not it remained passive. Never moved forward as RDQM has its own limitations.
I found it also strange that IBM hasn't done anything about potential split brain situation in RDQM DR setup, when primary node is going down for any reason. As we need to keep the business going we manually set secondary instance as primary but when former primary node is brought to life (for example network issue is fixed) we have split brain situation. This is not handled in a common sense way, multi instance is implemented in a better way.