Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Ideas

Showing 705 of 3332

Do not allow multiple sessions

Application management includes the ability to control the number of users and user sessions that utilize an application. Limiting the number of allowed users and sessions per user is helpful in limiting risks related to DoS attacks.
7 months ago in IBM License Metric Tool (ILMT) 0 Submitted

Distinguish between READ, UPDATE and ALTER for Utility CSQ5PQSG

Enhanced security because not in all cases ALTER access is necessary but the utility always requires ALTER. VERIFY should also work with READ access because it does not update anything.
7 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Under review

ILMT REST API be able to edit a supress/exclude comment of an instance

Hello, We want to modify the comment of a line already excluded or deleted with the method : PUT https://hostname:port/api/sam/v2/software_instances https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/license-metric-tool?topic=v2-classifying-software#put_software...
over 1 year ago in IBM License Metric Tool (ILMT) 1 Not under consideration

RDQM: Protection of the data in transit

Good day, IBM MQ Advance 9.2.0.x does not support protection of the data in transit during data replication in between nodes when using RDQM DR/HA solution, like TLS encryption.This means that banks are unable to use it in the default form, becaus...
almost 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

VLAN interface as a local interface for floating IP of HA queue manager on MQ Appliance platform

Currently in MQ Appliance version 9.3.0 LTS use of VLAN interface supporting tagged VLAN networks as a local interface for floating IP address for high availiblity queue manager is not possible. This limits use of VLAN interfaces only to standalon...
almost 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

ILMT to be able to capture and report on actual compiler execution times from SLM tags

Right now ILMT reads SLM tags from the servers for IBM XLC compilers - but only averages out compile times to a 24 hour period. This means it is not useful for IBM compiler concurrent user license tracking. SLM tags has been documented as the new ...
about 1 year ago in IBM License Metric Tool (ILMT) 0 Planned for future release

Document com.ibm.mq.jmqi.defaultMaxMsgSize JVM environment variable

Since IBM has hidden the fact that an MQGET for Java/JMS will actually use an initial buffer of 4KB and if the message is larger then it does (1) re-allocates the buffer size to the new larger size and (2) issues another MQGET to retrieve the mess...
about 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Backout target for subscriber objects

Many of our topic/subscriber objects are defined on the queue managers instead of being dynamically created by applications. These subscriptions then point to a queue on the same queue manager. When the destination queue has an issue (like it bein...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Add JMS 3.0 Queues and Connection Factories to IBM MQ Explorer

Currently only JMS 2.0 Queues and CF are visible in MQ Explorer, would be nice to Administer, Configure and Support if JMS 3.0 Queues and CF are visible in MQ Explorer
7 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

Provide source for no longer supported csqorexx procedures and ispf panels

CSQOREXX and related ISPF panels do not support CERTLABL attribute of channel, nor is it taken into account when using the "DEFINE LIKE" function (which is dangerous).I opened a PMR, but was told that CSQOREXX is no longer supported, and new attri...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.