Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

View all
PINNED Request for Adding Limited GitOps Functionality to default Domain
We have some use cases around form factor portability and cloud instance provisioning where it might be helpful to have an automated approach to loading common configurations to the default domain through GitOps. Some examples are the RBM and ODR ...
PINNED It should be possible to step-in while debugging Flow Services
As of webMethods.io Integration 11.0.7, a Flow Service can be debugged step by step in the Flow Service editor, but for an INVOKE step, the debugger can only step over the INVOKE step. It would be very helpful if the debugger would also allow to s...

All ideas

Add ability to configure DataPower WebUI TLS Profile from APIConnectCluster / DataPowerService CRs

Please make it so it is as easy to configure the TLS certificates for the DataPower WebUI as it is for the other API Connect endpoints. For example, the APIConnectCluster can be configured with most endpoints and secret names, like this: apiVersio...
over 1 year ago in DataPower Gateway 1 Not under consideration

Predictive API usage using AI

Based on historical API usage would like to get a predicted future usage for more accurate sizing of environments/contracts.
over 1 year ago in API Connect 0 Future consideration

Record and Replay functionality - Inserting more message fields into the recording table when an event monitor gets triggered

Other than the monitoring fields that are currently available (when we create an monitoring event), is there any other way we can insert data into the recording table? Our requirement is that, when we record the incoming message, we need to insert...
over 14 years ago in App Connect 4 Future consideration

Implementation of HMAC (Hash-based Message Authentication Code) in the webMethods Integration Server

I would like to be able to set HMAC as an encryption option under pub.security.encrypt.
over 1 year ago in webMethods Integration/Microservices Runtime 1 Planned for future release

MQ .NET Managed Client: Support alias CipherSpecs such as ANY_TLS13_OR_HIGHER

In MQ .NET Managed Client, please add support for alias CipherSpecs such as ANY_TLS13_OR_HIGHER. A queue manager provider supports several cipher specs and recommends we configure the alias CipherSpec rather than a specific cipher, however, MQ .NE...
about 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Support request for MQ Server and Client V9.1 on Windows Server 2019

We want to ensure MQ Server and MQ Client software is 100% compatible and supported when running on Windows Server 2019, to avoid any interruption or adverse impact to our business.
almost 7 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

multi-factor authentication (MFA)

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is must have requirement in today's remote working model to securely validate user identity. Allowing AHST/Aspera Share UN/PW authentication doesn't seems to be an adequate security.
over 5 years ago in Aspera Ideas 5 Functionality already exists

Ability to configure priorityClassName for all API Connect v10 components

When running API Connect on an Enterprise Kubernetes or OpenShift cluster with multiple applications (and not just IBM API Connect) it is vital that IBM API Connect can run on the cluster and that the kubernetes scheduler can find room for the com...
almost 4 years ago in API Connect 0 Future consideration

Urgently need support for .net managed mode advanced message security

Here are the links that explain AMS support in .NET http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/mqams/v7r0m1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.mqese.doc%2Ftroubleshooting%2Ftroubleshooting_netsupport.htm http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSFKSJ_7.5.0/c...
about 12 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

Faspex: Multi-factor authentication for local Faspex accounts

We have cases where it is not practical or possible to use SSO, and provision Faspex accounts for users. Unfortunately, Faspex doesn’t offer support for multi-factor authentication when using local accounts, only when SAML is used. I would love to...
almost 4 years ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration