Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 504

Add three fields to STATQ that are in published equivalent

STATMQI and STATQ contain almost equivalent data whether you collect statistics written to the SYSTEM.ADMIN.STATISTICS.QUEUE or the published system topics. This makes it seem like the intent is for them to be the same. STATMQI seemingly is identi...
7 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

RDQM: Protection of the data in transit

Good day, IBM MQ Advance 9.2.0.x does not support protection of the data in transit during data replication in between nodes when using RDQM DR/HA solution, like TLS encryption.This means that banks are unable to use it in the default form, becaus...
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Encryption at rest for Distributed MQ data without the use of AMS (i.e. without SSL certificates)

An option to encrypt MQ data (logs, queue files, config files, etc) without the need to setup AMS and use SSL certificates would allow us to meet regulatory and internal risk policies without the SSL cert management requirements. Essentially, if t...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Generating mq event messages for CSQX544E / CSQX548E

In a more and more hybrid mq qmgr connection world the likelihood of filling remote DLQ's is rising. In z/OS environments the qmgr's are noticing this by generating the following messages in the joblogs : CSQX544E (Messages for channel channel-nam...
over 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Not under consideration

Websphere MQ - enhance CHLAUTH User mapping with wildcards

Enhance MQ v7.5 and v8 to provide a more flexible CHLAUTH feature for the USERMAP feature. Currently this allows mapping of a "client asserted" id to another id value for MCAUSER purposes. However it does not allow wildcards in the client id mappi...
over 10 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Future consideration

New Feature for IBM MQ AMS on UNIX Platform

Right now IBM MQ AMS can't be implemented between 2 queue mangers on distributed platforms where one support AMS and other doesn't support AMS on distributed platforms. Please get this feature enabled on distributed platform as well for environmen...
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

MQMFT Operator in CP4I

CP4I MQ Advance operator don't support MQMFT binaries which is used by many clients including us. Based on following work, could you include this feature as part of official CP4I offerings. https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/mqmft
almost 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

DRBD - TCP Encryption

DRBD as supplied with MQ 9 does not offer the capability of encrypting replicated block data across TCP between nodes. DRBD should offer this capability out of the box rather than solutions engineered on top.
over 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

RFE to insure integrity of messages in an IBM MQ Appliance HA group.

We don't want the secondary Queue Manager to start unless it can be certain that the messages in the primary and secondary Appliances have integrity.
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

Dynamic reduction for SMDS after extends

During a MQ Health Check, an IBM MQ expert gave us an advice to use SMDS instead of DB2 offloading for shared MQ Messages. It has much more performance than using DB2 for offloading. Unfortunately, the size of the SMDS increase if MQ has a big wor...
almost 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration