Skip to Main Content

This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 13, 2022

New Feature for IBM MQ AMS on UNIX Platform

Right now IBM MQ AMS can't be implemented between 2 queue mangers on distributed platforms where one support AMS and other doesn't support AMS on distributed platforms. Please get this feature enabled on distributed platform as well for environment to be more secure and enhanced security.

Since this feature is not available we have to opt for 3rd Party encryption API to encrypt message at rest and during transit and had to bear extra cost.

We also raised the PMR with IBM to get feature details but unfortunately its not yet available -:

Idea priority Urgent
  • Admin
    Mark Taylor
    Oct 18, 2022

    We recognise that this is a valid requirement. However it doesn't fit with our delivery plans for the next couple of years. At one point there was a formal statement of direction that this was expected to be delivered,. However the plans and priorities have changed so this is no longer likely to be done in the current cycle.

    As a result we are declining this Idea. While declined the Idea can still be voted, and commented, upon.