Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Ideas

Showing 727

Addition of support to modify multiple records using SalesForceRequest node

Please add support to modify multiple records using SalesForceRequest node.
over 6 years ago in App Connect 3 Future consideration

App Connect - Order Management Integration Connector need to support BASIC AuthStyle

As a App connect user who uses the Order Management connection, I want to to manage the connection Authstyle beyond Standard so that I can easily switch from development, to staging, and to live mode without being too concern on the security valid...
over 3 years ago in App Connect 1 Future consideration

.NET standalone client login/tracing in .NET Standard is a regression compared to .NET Framework

- On .NET Framework tracing and loging was configured on a file in the filesystem. For .NET Standard, enabling tracing/loging requires setting environment variables. This is incovenient in many scenarios, in example companies where development tea...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Include command "getent group mqm" in runmqras

Currently runmqras issue command "id mqm" but not "getent group mqm". The command "getent group mqm" is helpful to know which userids are in group mqm.
almost 7 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Future consideration

Provide sub-tracing options

We ask that other traces be exposed/made available. Other traces to consider:* FTP (JSCH)* HTTP* SOAP* JSSE (Security/SSL/TLS)* Global Cache (WXS)* LDAP* Java root logger* Class loading* ODBC (database)* JDBC (Java database)* Utility (commands)* P...
over 10 years ago in App Connect 5 Future consideration

qmgr event for stale messages on xmitq

Threshold for which, in seconds, should be configurable on qmgr level. Qmgr would maintain a system health topic, and subtopic for each defined xmitq and place there retained publications for each such condition met or cleared. You may qualify thi...
over 10 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 6 Future consideration

JMSEndpoint operational policy

We have now got brilliant MQExpoint operational policy that gives us the option to change MQ connectivity parameters for multiple MQ nodes. Could you please implement this for the JMS nodes?
over 10 years ago in App Connect 3 Future consideration

Event based on MQ Enqueue Dequeu rate

We are requesting to add event generated based on write/read rate. Just an example, couple of queue attributes like listed below QEnqHighLimit (a set number, or perhaps percentage of some ‘MaxEnqNumber')QEnqLowLimit (a set number, or perhaps perce...
over 10 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

amqsmon reading queue

amqsmon is reading only from SYSTEM.ADMIN.STATISTICS.QUEUE / SYSTEM.ADMIN.ACCOUNTING queue. If the messages are transferred to some other queue or if using alias queue amqsmon can't be used any more. Would you please add additional attribute [-Q t...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Future consideration

Possibility to choose a MQ Policy for Timeout nodes & Co

Currently, it is only possible to use the default remote Queue Manager. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/app-connect/12.0?topic=nodes-timeoutcontrol-node I would like to be able to choose my MQ Policy at the design time or during the deploy, as MQ Nodes
over 3 years ago in App Connect 1 Future consideration