Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 238

MQMFT Operator in CP4I

CP4I MQ Advance operator don't support MQMFT binaries which is used by many clients including us. Based on following work, could you include this feature as part of official CP4I offerings. https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/mqmft
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

RDQM: Protection of the data in transit

Good day, IBM MQ Advance 9.2.0.x does not support protection of the data in transit during data replication in between nodes when using RDQM DR/HA solution, like TLS encryption.This means that banks are unable to use it in the default form, becaus...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Resubmitting backed-out messages

BOQNAME and BOTHRESH attributes of a local queue are incomplete solution to the problem discussed as early as for example this: http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=24679Add further BO attribute(s) to the queue that will control qmgr beh...
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

Improve the MQGET Performance in a Queue-Sharing environment if IGQ ( Inter-Group Queuing ) is enabled

With the current IGQ implementation, IGQ does not scale well in a QSG ( Queue-Sharing Group ) and Coupling-Facility setup. MQ Development has mentioned that there is a need to look at splitting up the IGQ (i.e. have one per qmgr, or maybe even one...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Additional MQSC command (for full Repository qmgrs) to list queue/qmgr subscribers

In a large MQ cluster , its possible that a specific cluster queue has been subscribed to by many "client" qmgrs in the cluster. To determine the impact of a specific queue being unavailable (eg the consuming application has failed) , there is cur...
about 11 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Not under consideration

IBM Java Interlanguage Batch for z/OS V2.4 and V2.5 provides the opportunity to implement Batch Jobs with Interlanguage Calls between COBOL and Java, which use the same thread from COBOL and Java to Db2 and act as one UOW. This support should be expanded expanded to MQSeries.

IBM Java Interlanguage Batch for z/OS V2.4 and V2.5 allows us to implement jobs with Interlanguage Calls (ILC) between COBOL and Java and access to Db2 as one thread. Pre-Requisite for this new feature is the APAR PH45216 in LE and PH48861 in Db2 ...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Dynamic reduction for SMDS after extends

During a MQ Health Check, an IBM MQ expert gave us an advice to use SMDS instead of DB2 offloading for shared MQ Messages. It has much more performance than using DB2 for offloading. Unfortunately, the size of the SMDS increase if MQ has a big wor...
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

IBM MQ Command to temporarily have MQ reset Sender/Receiver channel sequence numbers

It would be useful to have a command that can turn on a switch that would allow MQ to reset the Sender/Receiver Channel sequence numbers and then turn the switch off.
almost 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

PKCS#12 Support for AMS Store

Can we please have PKCS 12 Support for the AMS Store
almost 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Enhance dmpmqcfg command to dump in XML format

The dmpmqcfg command can export the information in different formats: Usage: dmpmqcfg ... -o Format: mqsc, 1line, setmqaut, grtmqmaut. But all these formats are only usable as a backup. They can´t really be used to further process these informatio...
over 9 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration