Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Workspace App Connect
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 15, 2013

RELATED IDEAS

Extend function of command mqsicvp

Please add JDBC Connection checking to the mqsicvp command, in addition to the level of checking that can be done for an ODBC connection set up.

Idea priority Medium
RFE ID 38119
RFE URL
RFE Product IBM App Connect Enterprise (formerly IBM Integration Bus)
  • Admin
    Ben Thompson
    Reply
    |     Oct 24, 2021

    Idea / RFE Review. Thank you for taking the time to raise this enhancement request, and apologies for the length of time it has been held in the status of Uncommitted Candidate / Future Consideration status. This is an area of the product we would like to enhance, and although there have only been 3 votes against this item, a duplicate RFE has currently received 26 votes in favour:

    https://integration-development.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/APPC-I-163

    Given this more recently raised request with the far greater support, we are choosing to close down this item and will continue to track this topic using 163 moving forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Oct 7, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Integration
    Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Connectivity and Integration
    Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement. We'd like both JDBC and ODBC to be equivalent in terms of capability, and extending the cvp command to include JDBC connections would be a good step forward.

  • Load older comments

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.