This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Per, PMR 41175,442,000, in version WMB 8.0.0.2, the .broker files used to attach and administer brokers from WMB Explorer, and WMB Toolkit. IBM Support asked me to open RFE. See their email below.
----- UPDATE -----
As mentioned earlier we do not have any provision to include dual Broker
connection information in <.broker> file. Please note that it is
designed to take only one Broker connection information and
changes to make it handle multiple Brokers would need to follow a
separate process called RFE. We would like you to be informed that the
support system can comment only on something already available in
the product. As the current scenario deals with a functionality
to be extended it needs to be handled through RFE process to design and
decide on the structure/syntax. Any such new feature request puts you
in direct communication with Broker development.
Request you to submit the RFE from URL https://wwwprdw.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/
so that it can be considered for the coming releases of the product.
---- /UPDATE -----
Please let us know if you have further questions or comments regarding this PMR.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Kind regards,
WMB L2 Support
Idea priority | Medium |
RFE ID | 41536 |
RFE URL | |
RFE Product | IBM App Connect Enterprise (formerly IBM Integration Bus) |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
RFE Review. Apologies for the length of time this RFE has been in the status of Under Consideration. Whilst we view this as quite a minority use case, and one which is easily worked around, we acknowledge that enhancing the product in this way would make it more user-friendly for those who are utilising highly available pairs. Noting the solid (9) number of votes, yet also that there has not been recent evidence of popularity, it is unlikely that this request will be prioritised in the short term, but we will continue to monitor it. Status of the RFE is updated to Uncommitted Candidate.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Connectivity and Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
It might be more than two hosts running the MI QM and broker.
Referencing a CCDT file might be a better way to implement this RFE.