Integration
This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
RFE Review. RFE 63942 was closed as a duplicate of 70056 in June 2015, but a recent comment (Nov 2020) indicates that the initial raiser of 63942 feels it is unfair to couple these issues together. Reading the use cases presented on 70056, I agree that use case 1 implied searching for redundant resources in the Toolkit project prior to a BAR file being built ... but use case 2 does seem to be focussed on noticing when an unused artifact will be *deployed*. So, use case 2 of 70056 does appear very related because if we were to provide a BAR file build feature to display unused files this seems closely related to allowing removal of particular files from within an application when building it into a BAR. Given that the confusion lies with the two disparate use cases on 70056, and also given the recent active comment showing continued interest in 63942, we are re-opening 63942. This update will also be posted on 70056 which will be place in to Need More Info status pending feedback from the creator of 70056. 70056 will be reviewed again in 30 days time.
I don't understand the updates here at all.
As far as I can tell, the linked RFE has nothing to do with this RFE... This RFE requests the ability to exclude workspace resources from the build path, the other RFE requests the ability to detect redundant resources within a project
Also - the headline of this RFE has been updated with "This request is a duplicate of an internally tracked request that is not currently available on the site. Please contact us to migrate the request to the site."
...this is both in contradiction to the comment update (linking this RFE to another) and unhelpful - why make me contact you to make something you have available internally available on this site? The contact link you supplied requests that I select from a range of topics which aren't applicable, and finally a contact group - again, how would I know who should pick this up?
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Connectivity and Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
Thanks for raising - this looks like a duplicate:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewChangeRequest&CR_ID=70056
If this other RFE does not cover the use case, feel free to append information to 70056, or open a new RFE. Thanks!