This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
The IIB MQ nodes (MQInput, MQOutput, etc.) reference an MQEndpoint policy by the "Policy URL" property, whose value can now be set as a string only.
We need that the "Policy URL" property's value could also be set by using / including values from variables too (e.g. by inheriting an IntegrationServer property, etc.), so that the URL is dynamically composed when the msgflow starts and the specific MQpolicy is eventually referenced.
Idea priority | Medium |
RFE ID | 92605 |
RFE URL | |
RFE Product | IBM App Connect Enterprise (formerly IBM Integration Bus) |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Thank you for raising this RFE. IBM agrees that this enhancement sounds like it would make an excellent addition to the product's capabilities. With the advancements made in the Policy arena in ACEv11, this is very much on our radar for future evolution. We would be particularly interested in users thoughts on how the externals for this suggestion could be implemented ... for example rather than making the name of the policy itself dynamic, perhaps we should consider making individual policy properties dynamic (or rather abstracted from the policy itslef via reference to a variable) ... also it would be good to know users views on where/how the variables should be assigned values - we think perhaps in the server.conf.yaml file.
Status of this RFE is updated to Uncommitted Candidate.