Integration
This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
RFE Review. Thank you for taking the time to raise this RFE and apologies it has been in Submitted status for a while. It is possible to create a mapping with an output complex element as an array. A for-each transform can be used to apply values in to the output structure. The problem described in the RFE is that the value which is mapped into each output leaf element needs to be different, depending on whether the output field is occurence number 1, 2, 3 ... etc. This could be solved by making the current index of the output structure available to the for-each loop expression for example. Assuming we have correctly understood the suggestion, we are placing the RFE into Uncommitted Candidate status. We also note that the RFE has only received 3 votes over its 3 year lifespan, so whilst not a high business priority for us, we will continue to monitor for comments with interest.