Skip to Main Content

This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace App Connect
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 24, 2021

Support remote MQ for FTE node

In the new way of deploying AppConnect on Kubernetes, the support of a local MQ queue manager (within the same pod) has been not recommended or at least not promoted.

The recommendation is to have a remote queue manager.

The FTE node in ACE still require to have a local queue manager which prevent customer to migrate easily their ACE installation on k8s.

Would it be possible to provide the ability to use remote queue manager for FTE nodes ?

Idea priority Urgent
  • Admin
    Ben Thompson
    Nov 25, 2022

    RFE Review. This feature has now been delivered as part of ACEv12.0.7.0:

  • Guest
    Sep 14, 2022

    I also have a customer with this problem. We have a workaround for now but it's not ideal.

  • Admin
    Ben Thompson
    Oct 3, 2021

    Idea / RFE Review. Thank you for taking the time to raise this enhancement request which we agree would improve the product. As you're probably aware, we have been pursuing a long term technical strategy for replacing the product's need for MQ server bindings to a local queue manager with MQ client bindings to a remote queue manager. The majority of functional uses of MQ have been dealt with, but the topic of this request still remains and it is something we would like to address in a future release. Status of the idea is updated to Future Consideration.