Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Submitted
Workspace Aspera Ideas
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 30, 2026

Granular transfer bandwidth controls per user, workspace, and or shared folder for AoC / HSTS nodes

Problem
In Aspera on Cloud, every transfer on a node runs as the single system transfer user (xfer). The node’s bandwidth controls in aspera.conf (per-transfer caps, aggregate caps, vlinks) are keyed to the system user, group or node. They can’t be scoped to the AoC user, workspace or shared folder that started the transfer. To the rate-limiting layer, every AoC user looks the same.

  • An aggregate cap on xfer is shared by everyone, so one user or workspace can starve the rest.

  • A per-transfer cap can’t give different users, groups or workspaces different limits.

  • The only workaround is a separate node per bandwidth tier, which adds infrastructure, operational and licensing overhead.

  • Changing the system user model isn’t an option, because AoC requires xfer.

Who benefits
Any organization using AoC to share data with multiple internal teams or external collaborators over a shared WAN link.

How it should work
Bandwidth policies, configured in AoC Admin and enforced by the node, scoped to any of:

  1. An AoC user or group

  2. A workspace

  3. A shared folder or access key

Each scope would support:

  • Per-transfer and aggregate caps

  • Separate upload and download limits

  • Hard caps, or defaults that can be locked so clients can’t override them

  • Clear precedence rules (for example user, then workspace, then node default)

Why it’s useful

  • Fair sharing of WAN capacity across teams and collaborators

  • Protects production links from bulk transfers

  • Supports tiered service levels and chargeback without extra nodes

  • Stays compatible with the required xfer model

Idea priority High