Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 26, 2021

MQMFT Operator in CP4I

CP4I MQ Advance operator don't support MQMFT binaries which is used by many clients including us.

Based on following work, could you include this feature as part of official CP4I offerings.

https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/mqmft


Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 2, 2022

    As part of this discussion there are two key components to MFT, the MQ Queue Manager and the MQ MFT Agent. MQ MFT Agents are free when they connect to MQ Queue Managers licensed under a MQ Advanced entitlement. This entitlement can also be provided by CP4I when MQ is deployed using the MQ Advanced ratio.

    IBM provides support for the MFT agent code running within a supported container environment. Customers can decide to build their own container image and we provide a GitHub repo for accelerating this process or they can pull our container from Docker Hub. The image hosted on Docker Hub is provided under the IBM MQ Advanced for Developers license to demonstrate the capabilities, and therefore non-Developer usage would require customers to rebuild the image using our GitHub repository.


    If you would like to discuss further, please contact me directly.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 1, 2022


    Hi Mark,

     

    Thanks for your reply.

     

    If I understood correctly, the DockerHub image you are suggesting is not supported by IBM. Am I missing something here? This feature is blocking my customer to move to CP4I so I would like to understand if this MQ MFT piece is covered in CP4I support, and if not, if there is any alternative.

     

    Thanks in advance,


    Brian Olmeda Morgade

    Customer Success Manager - Architect 

    EMEA Customer Success SRE Community of Practice Lead

    IBM Technology Sales

    United Kingdom & Ireland



     

     

    ----- Original message -----
    From: "IBM (Mark Taylor)" <4fed5935e24f728f6b987a2b-bigblue@iad-prod1.mailer.aha.io>
    To: brian.olmeda.morgade@ibm.com
    Cc:
    Subject: [EXTERNAL] MQMFT Operator in CP4I status has changed to Not under consideration
    Date: Tue, Feb 1, 2022 07:37
     


  • Admin
    Mark Taylor
    Reply
    |
    Feb 1, 2022

    Thanks for raising this enhancement, as you note we have already provided an "MFT agent container image" on DockerHub here. Customers can freely download and use in partnership with their MQ Advanced or Cloud Pak for Integration entitlements. We do not have immediate plans to integrate this into our MQ Operator, however we will continue to re-evaluate this based on demand.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 3, 2021

    Thanks for raising this - moved to the MQ ideas list so that it can be appropriately prioritised.