Integration
This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Given manufacturing pack includes restricted entitlement to ACE for manufacturing-only use cases in it's deployment, we would not suggest or support the manufacturing pack deployed on ACE installations that are part of CP4i or it's licensed entitlement. ACE deployed using CP4i entitlement is tracked via CP4i ratio table & pricing, which is different than what is licensed in the manufacturing pack. So they must remain separate. Closing this RFE.
Idea / RFE Review. Thank you for taking the time to raise this enhancement request. There are several aspects which would need to be considered here ... some technical (such as those manufacturing message flow nodes which require windows environments), and others regarding pricing and licensing (traditionally manufacturing pack has been aimed at a specific low price point in the market and it's not clear how this would translate to a CP4I context). Whilst IBM further considers some of these factors we are updating the status to Future Consideration.
Hi Santhosh, thanks for raising this - it's been passed to the App Connect team for appriopriate prioritisation.