Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

Aspera Ideas

Showing 247 of 2274

Increase or remove the HTML notification limit for self-hosted Faspex instances

Received this from Aspera support: "After consulting with our Faspex development team, I have discovered that there is a character limit of 1000 on the HTML form and 255 in the API. Unfortunately, these limits cannot be modified at this time ." Th...
about 9 hours ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Submitted

Faspex5 Webhooks Add Support for NoneStandard Port

I tried setting the "Webhook endpoint URI" to https://fqdn:9197 but when doing so we don't see any traffic use port 9197. Please add support for this as a feature.
3 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Submitted

Adding websocket support to ascp4

JPMC has an internal security policy that prevents using OpenSSH on Windows, so they need websocket support for all the components they use for their transfers. They plan to use ascp4 for migrations that have hundreds of millions of objects or lar...
5 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Under review

Increase timeout for Aspera Shares connecting to the node

We have a Windows Aspera Shares node that contains symbolic links to another servers. If the servers contain folders with a lot of images, it takes a lot of time to communicate that information into the node UI and we get a time out error. Increas...
about 2 months ago in Aspera Ideas 1 Functionality already exists

Re-word Orchestrator interactive setup prompt

In the interactive CLI setup program, it asks: What IP addresses and hostnames are allowed to access Orchestrator? This is written as if it is asking for the IP addresses and hostnames of clients, that are allowed to access the host.However, it is...
10 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

New statistics to indicate scan time and % source change.

First scan usually takes unknown duration, but once first scan is completed, subsequent scans should indicate: - % or time estimate needed to complete based on the first scan. - % of changes compared to base scan. It should be two items reported i...
11 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

Better job resume

Async should resume where it was stopped. Start scanning from the beginning will usually waste time, and in the case of large buckets, it could be many hours before transfer actually resumes.
11 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

Enhanced stop reason

The tool should provide clearer reasons for stopping: - Normal stop: job completed - Normal stop with errors: job completed, but there are file transfer errors - Requested stop: a user asked to stop - Abnormal stop: job did not finish, and somethi...
11 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

Permit sending a package to more than one Shared Inbox in which the sender has membership

At present, a Shared Inbox "submit only" sender can send to only one Shared Inbox at a time. If two shared inboxes include this individual as a "submit only" member, we would like that person to send a single delivery to both inboxes. Currently, i...
12 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

Permit Workgroups to be a recipient in sent/downloaded package notifications

While a sender can send a package to a Workgroup, and members of that workgroup receive notifications of package availability, the members of the workgroup have no visibility if any one individual downloads that package. Beyond viewing the histori...
12 days ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.