Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Ideas

Showing 722

ACE REST API - only one administration request (POST/PATCH/PUT/DELETE) can get processed by a single IntegrationServer and its not possible to execute them parallelly We want to have this behavior modified to be able to process multiple request in parallel.

ACE REST API - only one administration request (POST/PATCH/PUT/DELETE) can get processed by a single IntegrationServer and its not possible to execute them in parallel ( IBM response to a PMR ). We want to have this behavior modified to be able to...
about 2 years ago in App Connect 1 Future consideration

When a Source FTE agent crashes Destination Threads for In Progress transfers hang on the Destination FTE agent

The ability for Destination FTE agents to cope with outages to Source FTE agents that have crashed, and not have In Progress transfers from the crashed Source Agent holding on to the Destination transfers threads on Destination FTE agent.
about 13 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 6 Future consideration

RedHat Open JDK 11 Support for MQ v9 Clients

We are requesting that IBM support RedHat Open JDK 11, which ships with the RedHat Enterprise Linux distribution.
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

MQIPT - Suppress error msgs in logs

mqipt logs contain information on every connection. This generally works well until you have an external client that runs health check against your infrastructure by probing every few secs. Logs fill up very quickly and your can't see the woods fr...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Support for 3-Way replication on the MQ Appliance

The MQ Appliance currently supports synchronous replication between HA nodes and Async replication to a 3rd DR node. We are looking for the MQ Appliance to also be configurable to support Async replication to a 4th alternate DR node, the use case ...
over 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Make all truststore and keystore elements available in the custom resource - not just HTTP listener / input (ingress)

Currently in the IBM App Connect Custom Resource a keystore and truststore can be specified for the ‘forceHTTPS’ keys and certs. However, this only influences the PKI / TLS setup for the HTTP Listener configuration (fine for the HTTP Input node, d...
over 3 years ago in App Connect 1 Future consideration

Enable IBM MQ Java Classes to use the default SSLContext

I am requesting that the IBM MQ Java classes be enhanced to use the default SSLContext. I would expect a Java property could be introduced to enable this changed behaviour to be specified on the Java command line (eg: -DuseDefaultSSLContext=true) ...
over 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Enable configuration of multiple security requirements in a single account within the App Connect Designer (containers version) for Open API connector

Currently the designer does not support configuring multiple security requirements for an API or operation within a single account, i.e. AND rather than OR. For example, enable both Client Id (for API tracking) in-conjunction with OAuth for authen...
over 2 years ago in App Connect 1 Future consideration

Write current hostname and OS version to MFT Agent output log

When MFT Agent starts write current hostname and OS version to the MFT Agent output log. This is helpful diagnostic information where a single MFT Agent has been configured to run on more than one host for High Availability and the logfile is on a...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

Allow us to easily compare 2 or more WMB/IIB Brokers

I would like IBM to provide a tool to allow us to easily compare the configuration and/or deployed flows of 2 or more Brokers. Perhaps an enhancement to MB Explorer, or a separate add on plug in that would produce a table with connected brokers as...
over 11 years ago in App Connect 4 Future consideration