Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 590

Expose some internal processes to SMF

MQ has traditionally not exposed some internal processes to SMF data. This can mean there are processes acting on behalf of applications that those of us relying on observability via SMF cannot 'see.' For example, a customer heavily using administ...
4 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Under review

MQ operator support for GKE

While the IBM MQ Operator is currently only available for Red Hat OpenShift, and in preview for Amazon EKS, Operator support for GKE is not yet available. With this support, manmy company including mine would start to considering moving from old o...
4 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Future consideration

Add support for Alias CipherSpecs in MQIPT

Hello, since 9.2 IBM MQ support Alias CipherSpecs/CipherSuites, that is a keyword such as ANY_TLS13_OR_HIGHER for which the queue manager and the client will negotiate the best available CipherSpec/CipherSuite. This saves effort in constantly upda...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Functionality already exists

MQ z/OS better visibility into Dispatcher/Channel CPU consumption

We can see how much CPU the Dispatchers use, and how many channels are using them, but not which channels are using them an how much CPU is used by channel. Channels are associated with a dispatcher for their lifetime, so it should be possible to ...
10 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Under review

Creation date and time for some IBM MQ objects

Currently we noticed alias queues, remote queues, channels, services, listeners, topics, subscriptions don't have attributes for creation date and time so we are not able to check when these objects were created. And there must be a reason. And is...
12 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Increase OUTBUFF parameter for IBM MQ for z/OS

Hi there, We have many Production lpars complaining about "log buffer waits" for MQ managers. We have opened 2 IBM cases for that, we have implemented all best practices, but without success. OUTBUFF parameter is limited to 4000. Very small space,...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Support for MQ Explorer under Mac

In the case TS011871006 we are told that IBM only supports MQ Explorer under Linux & Windows but not under Mac (https: //www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-mq/9.2 ?topic = explorer-mq-installation-requirements) which implies that it is not possible to in...
almost 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Make MQTT available in the standard MQ container image for CP4I

We are running the latest SC-2 release of MQ on CP4I on Openshift. We have certain use cases which require having to configure MQ as an MQTT server on CP4I. Today the MQ Advanced container image from cp.icr.io/cp/ibm-mqadvanced-server-integration ...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Enhancement Request for IBM MQ Web Console.

Description: I would like to propose an enhancement to the current IBM MQ web console. The existing setup is a one-to-one mapping, where each queue manager must be accessed individually through its respective route. This limitation means that ...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Functionality already exists

refresh security reconnect

REFRESH SECURITY(*) TYPE(SSL) lacks the option equivalent to endmqm -r to indicate that clients should start a reconnect sequence when security is refreshed.In other words, reconnectable MQ clients do not try to reconnect when "refresh security(*)...
about 7 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 6 Future consideration