Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Submitted
Workspace App Connect
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 6, 2025

Improvement Suggestion – Enhance ACE Fix List Documentation for Security APARs

As part of our ongoing collaboration and review of recent ACE Fix Packs, we’d like to propose a potential improvement for the App Connect Enterprise documentation.

Currently, the ACE Fix List often includes entries labeled generically as “IBM APP CONNECT ENTERPRISE SECURITY/INTEGRITY APAR”, without additional context or linkage to the corresponding PSIRT bulletins or CVE identifiers. This makes it challenging for customers to accurately assess whether a given fix is relevant to their environments without opening a support case for clarification.

We believe it would be highly beneficial if the Fix List documentation could include more descriptive details for security-related APARs — for example:

  • A short summary of the issue type (e.g., GSKit vulnerability, REST API exposure, etc.)

  • Links to the corresponding Security Bulletin or PSIRT entry

  • The CVE ID when applicable

This enhancement would greatly improve transparency, reduce case volume for clarification, and help customers prioritize critical fixes more effectively.

Thank you very much for considering this suggestion and for your continued support.

Idea priority High