Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 22, 2014

Urgently need support for .net managed mode advanced message security

Here are the links that explain AMS support in .NET
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/mqams/v7r0m1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.mqese.doc%2Ftroubleshooting%2Ftroubleshooting_netsupport.htm

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSFKSJ_7.5.0/com.ibm.mq.sec.doc/q014660_.htm?lang=en

The current limitation is that AMS is not supported for .NET managed mode. This is not useful for almost all our .NET applications since we rely on end to end transactions using managed mode.

Idea priority Urgent
RFE ID 56438
RFE URL
RFE Product IBM MQ
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 15, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Integration
    Product - IBM MQ

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Connectivity and Integration
    Product - IBM MQ

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 9, 2014

    This is something we will consider for future updates to the .Net classes. However it would depend on suitable infrastructure being available from the core .Net implementation, in the same way as the SSL functions are exposed. It is not clear whether Microsoft's classes provide sufficient function; that would need to be investigated before any decision would be made. In the meantime, the MQ V8 .Net classes do now support SSL in managed mode, and you might consider using that in conjunction with the channel interceptor for AMS that runs inside the SVRCONN channel.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 12, 2014

    At present message level security in MQ .NET is provided via Unmanaged mode. In managed mode, only channel level security is provided. To provide message level security via managed mode, we will need an implementation that mimics the the implementation in unmanaged mode.

    At a high level, this requirement is implementable but requires some deep investigations to determine the level to which we can mimic message level security in unmanaged mode. Message level security implementation will depend on security implementation in .NET Framework. The security implementation in .NET Framework differs from GSkit implementation.


    This requirement is marked as "Recognized".
    #

0 MERGED

MQ AMS support for applications using .NET managed client

Merged
Our enterprise consists of applications coded primarily of applications coded in .NET C#. These applications utilize MQ as their messaging provider. We have a requirement to implement end-end message level encryption for point-point MQ messaging b...
over 7 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration