Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 490 of 2310

Update the MQ on Windows with newer version of VC++ redistribution package

The new MQ version 9.3 is still using the VC++ version 9 (released in 2008), which is too old for the Windows 2022 servers. In the requirements web site, it stated that MQ 9.3 is supported on Windows 2019 and Windows 2022. Why is it still using th...
12 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Show queue statistics in web console, e.g. last put/get time

Displaying the last put/get date timestamp is a good way to demonstrate to application owners that their missing message claims are not an MQ issue.
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Support request for MQ Server and Client V9.1 on Windows Server 2019

We want to ensure MQ Server and MQ Client software is 100% compatible and supported when running on Windows Server 2019, to avoid any interruption or adverse impact to our business.
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

MQMFT Operator in CP4I

CP4I MQ Advance operator don't support MQMFT binaries which is used by many clients including us. Based on following work, could you include this feature as part of official CP4I offerings. https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/mqmft
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

RDQM: Protection of the data in transit

Good day, IBM MQ Advance 9.2.0.x does not support protection of the data in transit during data replication in between nodes when using RDQM DR/HA solution, like TLS encryption.This means that banks are unable to use it in the default form, becaus...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Resubmitting backed-out messages

BOQNAME and BOTHRESH attributes of a local queue are incomplete solution to the problem discussed as early as for example this: http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=24679Add further BO attribute(s) to the queue that will control qmgr beh...
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

Support MQSAMP_USER_ID for MQ High Availability Samples

We are running the EUS version of MQ on CP4I 2020.4.1 on Openshift 4.6.53 on Azure cloud. The MQ High Availability Sample programs such as "amqsphac" & "amqsghac" on MQ 9.2 do not prompt a password even after "MQSAMP_USER_ID" environment varia...
about 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Additional MQSC command (for full Repository qmgrs) to list queue/qmgr subscribers

In a large MQ cluster , its possible that a specific cluster queue has been subscribed to by many "client" qmgrs in the cluster. To determine the impact of a specific queue being unavailable (eg the consuming application has failed) , there is cur...
about 11 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Not under consideration

Improve the MQGET Performance in a Queue-Sharing environment if IGQ ( Inter-Group Queuing ) is enabled

With the current IGQ implementation, IGQ does not scale well in a QSG ( Queue-Sharing Group ) and Coupling-Facility setup. MQ Development has mentioned that there is a need to look at splitting up the IGQ (i.e. have one per qmgr, or maybe even one...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Enabling DNS caching for reverse DNS lookups

Could you enable DNS caching for reverse DNS lookup requests on MQAppliance?
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration