Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 508

MQMFT Operator in CP4I

CP4I MQ Advance operator don't support MQMFT binaries which is used by many clients including us. Based on following work, could you include this feature as part of official CP4I offerings. https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/mqmft
almost 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 4 Not under consideration

RFE to insure integrity of messages in an IBM MQ Appliance HA group.

We don't want the secondary Queue Manager to start unless it can be certain that the messages in the primary and secondary Appliances have integrity.
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

Add three fields to STATQ that are in published equivalent

STATMQI and STATQ contain almost equivalent data whether you collect statistics written to the SYSTEM.ADMIN.STATISTICS.QUEUE or the published system topics. This makes it seem like the intent is for them to be the same. STATMQI seemingly is identi...
7 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Dynamic reduction for SMDS after extends

During a MQ Health Check, an IBM MQ expert gave us an advice to use SMDS instead of DB2 offloading for shared MQ Messages. It has much more performance than using DB2 for offloading. Unfortunately, the size of the SMDS increase if MQ has a big wor...
about 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

Enabling DNS caching for reverse DNS lookups

Could you enable DNS caching for reverse DNS lookup requests on MQAppliance?
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

IDZ support for AMS

IDZ or mq explorer should support updating and creating policies on z.os like it does on distributed.
almost 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

Add STOP CONN to z/OS environment

Add the command STOP CONN to the z/OS platform like on Mutliplatforms
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Enable the connection of CICS tasks with a QSG

Currently it is only possible to connect a CICS task to a single queue manager in a fixed way. If CICS were able to connect to any queue manager of a QSG, it would increase flexibility and availability within the environment.
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Functionality already exists

Create a facility to manage Topics and Subscriptions through MQADM (TSO SDSF)

Currently it is only possible to manage topics and subscriptions by the MQ Explorer application or by running batch jobs (CSQUTIL). If this possibility is extended to MQADM, the maintenance of these resources would be much more user-friendly and e...
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Provide more detailed information on wait times incurred when using the HA and/or DR features of the MQ Appliance

Today there is no way to tell whether network latency or other delays on the HA and/or DR interfaces are impacting the performance of queue managers making use of either or both of these features on the MQ Appliance. Excessive delays when using ei...
over 5 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration