Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

View all
PINNED Request for Adding Limited GitOps Functionality to default Domain
We have some use cases around form factor portability and cloud instance provisioning where it might be helpful to have an automated approach to loading common configurations to the default domain through GitOps. Some examples are the RBM and ODR ...
PINNED It should be possible to step-in while debugging Flow Services
As of webMethods.io Integration 11.0.7, a Flow Service can be debugged step by step in the Flow Service editor, but for an INVOKE step, the debugger can only step over the INVOKE step. It would be very helpful if the debugger would also allow to s...

All ideas

Showing 3376 of 3376

Support for Probabilistic Exponentially Weighted Moving Average algorithm

Provide support for an “Probabilistic Exponentially Weighted Moving Average” algorithm used to calculate single metric Anomaly Detection outliers and insert (with TTL) those outliers into a backend sink (in-memory) data store.
over 1 year ago in IBM Event Automation / Event Processing 1 Future consideration

Support for API/ledger source function

IBM Event Automation should support an API/ledger source function where the OTel Collectors can send their streaming data. The API/Ledger component needs to be fully in-memory and have a supported Flink connect.
over 1 year ago in IBM Event Automation / Event Processing 2 Future consideration

Regarding Multiple Sessions in Appliance UI

We need to understand the ability of creating multiple sessions using single user ID in MQ on the application (admin portal) i.e. concurrent logins are not prohibited making application prone to password sharing and chances of distorted audit trai...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

App Connect - connectivity suggestions - Lawson M3 ERP system

We have multiple clients that use Infor M3 as their ERP system. Currently IBM have connector for SAP which is fine. However there is a large client base of Infor M3 ERP. https://www.infor.com/products/erp More and more clients are currently moving...
about 6 years ago in App Connect 1 Planned for future release

User registries should not require unique email IDs

Today API Connect has the following restrictions/requirements regarding user registries: All users of the following kind must be registered with an email ID: users in local user registries consumer users (local or non-local user registries) In any...
over 4 years ago in API Connect 0 Future consideration

Enable support to allocate CPU and memory on MQ Appliance

Provide the capability to allocate or limit CPU and memory resources for individual queue managers on the MQ Appliance.
about 9 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

Requesr for support of .NET Framework 4.8 by MQ Client V9.1 and V9.2

We and the customer(MAZDA Co.) require support of .NET Framework 4.8 by MQ Client V9.1 and V9.2 ASAP
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

[Faspex 5] Allow for selection of text of filenames in packages

Currently when attempting to select the text of files in a package, you are not able to. We would like the ability to select the text of the files in the package so we can copy the file names. This was possible in Faspex 4.
over 1 year ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Under review

For Uniform Clustering, we have a need to know more easily that the QMGR connection changed without having to query the connection for QMGR name for all MQ API calls constantly

We have some older MQ client connections that require to allocate a REPLY Q to identify the QMGR in use which is used to allocate a custom REPLY to Q name. Since UC can move connections around to rebalance them, it would be useful to have a variab...
over 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Allow Faspex Manager users to view packages sent to/from other users

It would be useful for users with Manager permissions to see packages sent to/from either a selection of users or all users. This currently requires Admin permissions, to view the .../aspera/faspex/admin/manage-packages page, however assigning ful...
over 1 year ago in Aspera Ideas 0 Under review