Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 620

MQ must be resilient to System Request 2 on IBM i

In i5/OS there is an option called SYSREQ 2 - end previous request. Using this function within MQ on IBM i has damaging and sometimes unrecoverable effects. When a user unknowingly uses SYSREQ 2 for a slow responding MQ function, it may go unnotic...
over 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

MQ .NET Managed client - Use most secure common negotiated CipherSpec by default

When I try to use the alias Ciphers (ANY_TLS12_OR_HIGHER) which are very popular now, it is silently ignored and instead it is defaulting to insecure TLS 1.0 by default. Can you change IBM MQ.NET managed client in this way : - Use most secure Ciph...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Is a defect

IBM MQ Web console service support

Why can't IBM provide facility to make IBM MQ Web console service to be running as windows service like other service or start service with service account?
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Not under consideration

Make IBM MQ for Windows on ARM available

Can someone port IBM MQ for Windows x64 Server and Client to Windows ARM? And make it available as a developer release.
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Not under consideration

Provide support for MQ Classes for JMS in Liberty

RFE to provide support for MQ Classes for JMS in Liberty: Migrating Applications from tWAS that use MQ Classes for JMS or MQ Classes for Java to another J2EE environment not supported for Liberty, but is supported for any other J2EE environment. A...
over 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Run IBM MQ control commands over HTTPS

As our highly regulated firm moves to running its applications in containers a non negotiable policy decision was made to remove SSH access to containers. This means we cannot easily move MQ to containers as we have no way to run the MQ control co...
over 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

REST API for adminstration (Remote)

in MQ 9.3.3 REST api for messaging was enhanced to run over CCDT; meaning to more SDR/RCV channel and REST endpoint would initiate the client conn connection. For admin API we need SDR/RCV channels; and in a large or small env; it is a pain settin...
over 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 5 Future consideration

Configure JMS applications to connect to IBM MQ in bindings mode in CICS (Integrated Mode for Liberty)

Currently only the following is true.. If you want to configure JMS applications to connect to IBM MQ in bindings mode (supported only in CICS standard-mode Liberty). We have a desire to use CICS integrated -mode Liberty for backout/recovery reaso...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Add & Document com.ibm.mq.jmqi.defaultMaxMsgSize for .NET Framework

Since IBM has hidden the fact that an MQGET for .NET will actually use an initial buffer of 4KB and if the message is larger then it does (1) re-allocates the buffer size to the new larger size and (2) issues another MQGET to retrieve the message....
over 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Increased granularity for MQ Event Message Delivery

I am looking for IBM to enhance the granularity of delivery options for MQ generated Event messages. While newer Event Message types such as Configuration Events get their own queue (SYSTEM.ADMIN.CONFIG.EVENT), legacy events share common queues. A...
over 12 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 5 Future consideration