Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 487 of 2288

Cluster behavior when specifying non-default Cluster XmitQ

When the Qmgr attempts to move messages from the default SCTQ to the Non-default CTQ and it encounters a non-zero return code, such as a 2053 in this case, it should not simply leave the messages (and all new ones bound for the non-default CTQ) on...
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Add Eclipse-BuddyPolicy to IBM OSGi Client Libraries

Problem Description: In the MANIFEST.MF (from com.ibm.mq.osgi.allclient Bundle) the entry "Eclipse BuddyPolicy: registered" is missing. Can this entry be added to the MANIFEST.MF in a new version of the libraries? The following is the description ...
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Show queue statistics in web console, e.g. last put/get time

Displaying the last put/get date timestamp is a good way to demonstrate to application owners that their missing message claims are not an MQ issue.
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

RedHat Open JDK 11 Support for MQ v9 Clients

We are requesting that IBM support RedHat Open JDK 11, which ships with the RedHat Enterprise Linux distribution.
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Enhancements needed for MQ Web Console to rule out third party administration tools

We are planning to move away from MQExplorer and other third party administration tools and switch to MQ Web Console as the go-to utility, however most of the basic functionalities which we use on our day to day basis do not exist in the MQ Consol...
almost 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 6 Future consideration

Support for JMS transacted session for MQ RA (for WAS Liberty)

Maximo - as part of the IBM Cognitive Apps group - is a J2EE application that uses JMS (reliable messaging) for integrating to ERPs and other applications. We have over 4000+ customers using JMS messaging to integrate Maximo with other systems. Ma...
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

MQ specific error message needed if a second Create Thread is attempted by an IMS Application linked with the wrong Stub

Customer is running at IBM MQ for z/OS V9.0.0 LTSR and IMS..An IMS Transaction Application is linked by mistake with the CSQBSTUB Batch Adapter Stub, is executed in a IMS MPP Region and creates the first connection with MQ..Since "the Batch adapte...
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

MQ Web UI enhacements

The MQ Web Use Interface seems to be the future (or the present) hope of IBM to manage QMs in a central platform.As an MQ Administrator I find this tool enough good. But in our world, operation team have to administrate a day-to-day of basic MQ ac...
about 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

make MQ rpm packages upgradable

This RFE is related to upgrade of rpm packages of MQ client and MQ server on RedHat (single stage migration).RPM packages in general are upgradable. RMP or YUM take care of that.There is no need to uninstall old maintenance level prior to installa...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

MQ Resilience

Related to CASE TS003034554 1) Allow for a parameter on the queue manager object to set max number of dynamic queues. (like we have with channels in the CHIN) This would have made the rogue application and other applications unable to continue cre...
over 4 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration