Skip to Main Content
Integration
Hide about this portal


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 171

Increase OUTBUFF parameter for IBM MQ for z/OS

Hi there, We have many Production lpars complaining about "log buffer waits" for MQ managers. We have opened 2 IBM cases for that, we have implemented all best practices, but without success. OUTBUFF parameter is limited to 4000. Very small space,...
about 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

refresh security reconnect

REFRESH SECURITY(*) TYPE(SSL) lacks the option equivalent to endmqm -r to indicate that clients should start a reconnect sequence when security is refreshed.In other words, reconnectable MQ clients do not try to reconnect when "refresh security(*)...
over 6 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 6 Future consideration

Ability to restrict access to channel auth records

Currently there is no way to restrict access to channel auth records. This means any user can view the records currently in place regardless of their user role. This means that a read only user for example would be able to see the user names and h...
about 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

IBM MQ V9 RDQM support for zLinux

IBM MQ Adv 9.0.4 provides support for RDQM on x86 Linux (RH). Please extend/test this support for zLinux RH/Suse if those platforms provide the pre-req DBRD and Pacemaker support.
about 7 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Allow dedicated separate storage on a queue level basis for MQ on Windows and Unix

Similar to z/OS, we would like the ability to have one or more queues use a separate and dedicated of storage on Windows and Unix MQ systems.
about 11 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 7 Future consideration

MQ Wildcard certificate support

We are currently running MQ as part of our CP4i bundle, since the new version 2023.4 IBM has decided to use Keycloak to authenticate all products, problem is that MQ is the only package that doesn't support Wildcard certificates, we had cases TS01...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

IBM MQ Container and Operator: expose more detailed metrics for prometheus monitoring.

Today, as it is in MQ Operator, mq container expose a set of metrics that seems to be no enought for more detailed monitoring. We will need a plan to monitor our future mq deployment on openshift, and the best tool that suit is for monitoring, is ...
5 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Future consideration

Increase MQ Sender Channel CONNAME parm 48 Character Limitation on z/OS MQ.

Change the 48 character length limitation on the channel parameter CONNAME to increase to handle longer host names
about 3 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Provide support for MQ Classes for JMS in Liberty

RFE to provide support for MQ Classes for JMS in Liberty: Migrating Applications from tWAS that use MQ Classes for JMS or MQ Classes for Java to another J2EE environment not supported for Liberty, but is supported for any other J2EE environment. A...
7 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Application Transaction Tracing through MQ Appliance

This is critical to give customers using MQ appliance the ability to have end-to-end observability for their application stacks. Currently, customers cannot trace transactions through the appliance, creating a 'black box' scenario. This is a sever...
about 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 0 Future consideration