Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

View all
PINNED Add a "Maximum persistent reuse" parameter for the backside of an MPGW or WSP
On an MPGW or a WSP, I want to be able to configure that the persistent backside connection should be closed after X amount of requests have been sent through that connection. I can already do this for the frontside by setting the "Maximum persist...
Share feedback 1
PINNED OpenAPI schema validation including headers
Currently to schema validate a REST based API in DataPower you have to extract the JSON schema from the OpenAPI file and then code manually code the individual header checks defined in the OpenAPI file Would be a vast improvement to be able to j...
Share feedback 1

All ideas

Showing 745

TCPIP Node - Add Flexible Configuration Alternatives

DNS round robin----------------------------Currently message broker does not do a new DNS lookup per connection created. This type of configuration is required ideally a function directly to the node to do this in a more straight forward way (like...
over 12 years ago in App Connect 4 Not under consideration

Create Message Broker as a service on Linux

The client requires the Linux version of WMB 8 to integrate with the OS and install as a Linux service. It should be integrated with both the command line service command and the RHEL service manager GUI. This will make the operational activities ...
over 12 years ago in App Connect 3 Not under consideration

MB v8 WSRM needs Persistent QoS

To truly support mission critical reliable messaging especially with clustered MB brokers an in memory implementation is not reliable place to store sequence and message state. Something similar to Websphere's Managed Persistent QoS would be bette...
over 12 years ago in App Connect 3 Not under consideration

Raw YAML description is rewritten by the APIM to be double spaced

TS016932962 based on this support ticket, requesting the RFE.
3 months ago in API Connect 1 Not under consideration

RDQM: floating IP

Can the rdqmint command accept hostname defined in /etc/hosts when adding new IP? I know sometimes it won't work, but it is customer's responsibility to make the hostname correct, like in the same subnet, reachable IP, etc. By doing this way, it m...
4 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Not under consideration

Add support for node-owned servers to allow "ibmint optimize server" functionality.

We have a number of applications with 48 node-owned servers (up to 4 times on one linux host), the start up time is considerable and we hope to reduce this by having this option.
over 1 year ago in App Connect 1 Not under consideration

CP4I Full Support on Power systems

As of today as per the latest documentation available, CP4I is partially supported on Power systems. Refer: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cloud-paks/cp-integration/2022.4?topic=requirements-operating-environment. So namely there is no support for As...
over 1 year ago in Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) 3 Not under consideration

Visualization of existing integration landscape to provide insights for Agile Integration Modernization

Many major clients are currently using the IBM SOA stack and would need assistance with modernization (a.k.a the new migration) to Cloud Pak for Integration (including Red Hat OpenShift). However it's not an easy task since some customers may have...
over 2 years ago in Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) 2 Not under consideration

Inplace migration of Integration node form ACE11 to ACE12

Hi Team, We are planning to migrate our Integration nodes which are running with 11.0.0.16 to ACE 12.0.3, as per the instructions we have on IBM it seems we need to add the -- delete integration node when we run the extractcomponent command. In c...
over 2 years ago in App Connect 1 Not under consideration

Migration of Integration node from ACE11 to ACE12

Hi Team, Currently our Integratoin nodes are running with ACE 11.0.0.16 and there is a plan to migrate these nodes to ACE 12 version. As per the instructions and guidlines from IBM portal it seems we need to add --delete-existing-node parameter wh...
over 2 years ago in App Connect 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.