Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

View all
PINNED Request for Adding Limited GitOps Functionality to default Domain
We have some use cases around form factor portability and cloud instance provisioning where it might be helpful to have an automated approach to loading common configurations to the default domain through GitOps. Some examples are the RBM and ODR ...
PINNED It should be possible to step-in while debugging Flow Services
As of webMethods.io Integration 11.0.7, a Flow Service can be debugged step by step in the Flow Service editor, but for an INVOKE step, the debugger can only step over the INVOKE step. It would be very helpful if the debugger would also allow to s...

All ideas

Showing 3343

Queue Manager Errors Written to Topic

Please enhance MQ to publish its messages that it writes to the error logs (e.g. MQP1MSTR/MQP1CHIN job logs, distributed queue manager error logs, distributed FDC errors) to also a system topic. This would allow remote monitoring applications to b...
almost 9 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

Setup notification in DPOD when Datapower appliance experiences high CPU plateues

DPOD has Device CPU alert notification when spike is seen. We are looking for notification alert to be triggered whenever CPU plateaus on Datapower appliances. For instance if CPU usage reach 95% constantly in short period of time and having plate...
about 5 years ago in DataPower Operations Dashboard 1 Future consideration

option to disable aspera mobile app access to Faspex 5

This is very useful so that if the company does not approve the mobil app use of the system we can turn it off instead of shut down the whole Faspex 5 system. the mobile usage of the Faspex 5 system should be determined by the company security pol...
about 1 year ago in Aspera Ideas 1 Under review

IBM APIC support on Azure Nutanix

Current APIC deployment on Virtual environment is only supported for CISCO VMWare. We are looking for similar support for Nutanix hosting platform on Azure. Nutanix under the hood uses similar hypervisor as VMWare. but currently it is not in suppo...
about 1 year ago in API Connect 2 Not under consideration

Provide a AUTHOREV(NODISPLAY) option similar to CMDEV(NODISPLAY) to avoid 1000's of generated monitoring events that are no real authorization issue when using IBM MQ Explorer.

When using MQ Explorer, you get to see the queues / alias queues / ... for which you're authorized. When AUTHOREV is enabled, listing the queues in MQ Explorer generates 1000's of event messages on SYSTEM.ADMIN.QMGR.EVENT (depending on the number ...
about 2 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Functionality already exists

Make ID mapping optional

When defining the model, it requires me to have a mandatory ID. In doing so, it is mandatory for me to specify the ID. However, in a RDBMS, we do not usually specify the ID when to insert a row. We allow the database to generate an ID. This is not...
about 1 year ago in App Connect 1 Not under consideration

Support an ESQL function to return the type of a tree elements Value

FIELDTYPE() - returns stuff like XMLNSC.Attribute (INTEGER) FIELDVALUE() - returns the value What is lacking is a function to tell you the primitive type of the VALUE(CHAR, INTEGER, DECIMAL, TIMESTAMP etc) I know there is a way to check that a ref...
about 11 years ago in App Connect 3 Future consideration

AWS hosted Redis Service

Add support for AWS hosted service redis instead of having it locally on the HSTS nodes. This could be used with multiple HA HSTS instances.
about 4 years ago in Aspera Ideas 1 Not under consideration

Add Odata suppoort to message broker. (OData node for example)

We need the broker to provide full Odata implemetation, which could be done by the addition of an OData node. Right now we only have the capability to offer OData protocol through RESTfull interaction using HTTP nodes. To have full OData service w...
about 12 years ago in App Connect 3 Future consideration

Relaxing the DB2 dependency for starting shared channels

Shared channels of a queue sharing group remain in a retry status because there were problems (locked pages) with the corresponding DB2 system holding the shared channel status table. The problem is described in detail in PMR 10816,035,724. Sugges...
about 11 years ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration