Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


ADD A NEW IDEA

MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance

Showing 201

When using the v3 version of the MQ REST API’s Get Message service: GET /messaging/qmgr/{qmgrName}/queue/{queueName}/message we would like the MQ Put DateTime returned in one of the HTTP response headers which it currently is not.

We feel that this is a valuable piece of information to obtain when reading queued messages from MQ to know when a message was first written to the queue
9 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

if user sign-on to the queue manager fails we see the RACF-Message, but there exists no correponding massage which can identify the Channel or IP-Adress of the causer

in our case a srvconn tried to logon with an userid ‚admin‘ which does not exists in RACF. This happens automaticaly several times at a minute and made our joblog unreadable with mass of ICH408I messages. We did not find the causer of this problem...
9 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

REST API for adminstration

in MQ 9.3.3 REST api for messaging was enhanced to run over CCDT; meaning to more SDR/RCV channel and REST endpoint would initiate the client conn connection. For admin API we need SDR/RCV channels; and in a large or small env; it is a pain settin...
9 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration

The MFT Protocol Bridge Agent is not retrieving files from OpenText SFTP Servers due to a dependancy on lstat which is not fully supported by OpenText.

The RFC indicates lstat is a “should support” statement from the RFC for the protocol and not a “must support”. As IBM MFT is the client application it would seem prudent for it to support as many different implementations of the protocol for the ...
10 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Provide a Certified Container for MQ Advanced - which could be also used in Kubernetes

If you want to run MQ Advanced in Kubernetes you have currently to build the image on your own. There is no predefined image provided by IBM. See: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-mq/9.3?topic=pmic-support-building-your-own-mq-queue-manager-contain...
11 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

MQ Appliance scp/sftp add support for certificate based authentication

Add certificate based authentication for scp/sftp copies to and from the appliance.
11 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Update the MQ on Windows with newer version of VC++ redistribution package

The new MQ version 9.3 is still using the VC++ version 9 (released in 2008), which is too old for the Windows 2022 servers. In the requirements web site, it stated that MQ 9.3 is supported on Windows 2019 and Windows 2022. Why is it still using th...
11 months ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Show CFSTRUCT and STGCLASS objects in MQ Console WEB

Currently the MQ Console WEB does not show/manage the CFSTRUCT and STGCLASS objects for MQ z/OS. It will be a nice improvement if we can manage this kind of objects, like we can do using the ISPF panels.
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 2 Future consideration

.NET 6 support for MQ 9.2

MQ 9.3 now supports .NET6 (version currently supported by Microsoft) while MQ 9.2 only supports .NET core 3.1 which is not supported by MS anymore (see https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/platform/support/policy/dotnet-core ). Since 9.2 is supporte...
about 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 1 Future consideration

Add support for LDAPS in MQExplorer and JMSAdmin

When connecting to a remote JNDI repository via MQExplorer or JMSAdmin you can use LDAP. If LDAPS is not available (confirmed in Case TS011889627) we are forced to use LDAP and thus our data is unencrypted on the wire. MQExplorer and JMSAdmin shou...
over 1 year ago in MQ, MQ Advanced & MQ Appliance 3 Future consideration