This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updateson them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
In loadbalancers session affinity cookies settings allow customization of the SameSite attribute
Today loadbalancers on Datapower can handle session affinity via cookies.
Only the following cookie attributes can be set :
- HTTP Only
There is a real need the be able to also set the "SameSite" attribute, otherwise, in some scenarios t...
Add a "Maximum persistent reuse" parameter for the backside of an MPGW or WSP
On an MPGW or a WSP, I want to be able to configure that the persistent backside connection should be closed after X amount of requests have been sent through that connection. I can already do this for the frontside by setting the "Maximum persist...
Weblogic to 14.1.1 uses Java EE 8, When i was looking at latest MQ out there (9.3) it is only certified with Application that support the Java EE 7.0 specification, So what are the option in this case, Is new MQ version going to be released in near future that will support Java EE 8?
We are planning to upgrade Weblogic to 14.1.1 which uses Java EE 8, When i was looking at latest MQ out there (9.3) it is only certified with Application that support the Java EE 7.0 specification, So what are the option in this case, Is new MQ ve...
Support for Azure Stack HCI Virtualization Technology
See Support Case TS010726666 We would like it when the "Azure Stack HCI" Virtualization technology would be integrated into the ILMT Tool. Currently we do not see any possibility to integrate this new kind of hypervizor into ILMT using the ILMT VM...
Enhance the re[port period for Resource Utilization report
The current Resource utilzation report has a max of 30 days.
The retention period can be anything with a minimum of 30 days.
Because the contractual report date is 2 year, it makes sense to enhance the max reporting perio to 731 days (2 year).
A public REST-API of ILMT Server is required to upload disconnected scanner output packages
When ILMT disconnected scanner tool is deployed on a locked-down system (like one zVSI Appliance on a SSC LPAR), the external user cannot access the system except for provided rest-api, and there is also no way to share directory with outside from...
Recently, we had a problem when trying to add a new member to our Queue Sharing Group. The problem was that the SMDSCONN to this new member started with ALLOCFAIL error. The problem was caused by a full TIOT in the MQ MSTR address space. The solut...
We are establishing SSL connection from DP to MQ using MQ Queue manager object with requirement of strong ciphers. In the MQ queue manager object we see only a list of ciphers are present which are not considered strong as per FAB info sec policy....
When integrating Xen Hypervisor into ILMT the Management: VM Manager Report can show the Computer ID of VM Manager Tool. With this ID you can get the "computer name" within Reports->Computers It wpld be nice to have the possibility to select th...
When a sync is triggered it will first copy the data to the destination site and then tries to delete. When the disk becomes full this results in a disk full error for aspera and the process is left hung as it cannot proceed. This is also leading ...
forceServer... settings also for node owned Int.Servers
Until now to force https (Test ot Production) or http (unittest) this is done with bar overrides. When organisations change to one or the other they need to do a redeploy of every application.
Also, why is this different for SIS and node owned?
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.