Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive a notification on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
If you encounter any issues accessing the Ideas portal, please send email describing the issue to ideasibm@us.ibm.com for resolution. For more information about IBM's Ideas program visit ibm.com/ideas.
Idea / RFE Review. Apologies for the length of time this RFE has been held in Uncommitted Candidate / Future Consideration status. Our strong suspicion is that the need for this request has long since been satisfied through other means in any case, and for this reason coupled with the very low number of votes (2 votes over 9 years), we will not be moving forward with this suggestion. To expand on the reasoning here, the IIB/ACE graphical data mapping capability (GDM) has been made available as a common component within the company so that other parts of IBM can share it (in line with the open source style separable component idea), but this is a distinct issue from exposing the code in such a way that any alternative XSL or XQuery engine would be capable of executing the files in a non-proprietary context. As noted, the feature as currently designed and implemented deliberately chooses not to externalise the generated code. Any change from this strategy would obviously have commercial implications. Other points worth making in regard to this issue are that the ability to pre-compile maps and schemas into a BAR file prior to deployment has been made available in subsequent product releases, so there is no performance argument to be made in favour of changing the current operational model of this code component. Another factor worth considering is that the open-sourced JSONata mapping technology has also received higher levels of investment more recently than GDM, so in terms of long-term alternatives you may also wish to consider its capabilities too.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - WebSphere
Product family - Connectivity and Integration
Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB
Thanks for raising this requirement. At a high level, we think there are two phases to the solution: (1) Provide export capabilities from the mapper into XSL and/or xQuery, and (2) Improve the consumability of the mapper as a separable component. We'll look to start this work as a candidate for the second half of the year.