Integration
This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
RFE Review. Thank you for taking the time to submit this idea for enhancement, which we agree would improve the product. There are two potentially possible implementations which would achieve the use case presented:
a) Add support for a container image which combines ACE and MQ together in a single image.
b) Provide a mechanism for users to extend our operator code so that it can be used in conjunction with users' own built images (thus allowing you to build your own combined image).
Having previously offered a combined image (as mentioned in [a]) in earlier versions of our offering and moved away from this, we are currently minded that (b) would be the preferred option. That said we are open to further comments on this RFE to challenge or agree with this assertion. Meanwhile, status of the RFE is updated to Uncommitted Candidate.