Integration
This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Thank you for taking the time to raise this RFE. As you say, there are different preferences regarding the visuals for administrative UIs. Certainly, there were specific aims in our design choices for ACEv11 we certainly introduced more "white space" in the tile-views adopted in the web UI layout than there had been in the more tree-view focus applied to the IIBv10 web UI. In part, our aims here were to align separate software products in the IBM integration portfolio to have a closer more similar look and feel, and to create similarities between the dashboards we use in our public cloud, private cloud (container) and traditional software offerings. This has resulted in a design language which aims to be more inclusive of users who perhaps have less of a detailed coding background and would prefer simpler stylings. That said, your feedback is helpful to us and I'm sure our Design team will be interested to see that there is still a section of our userbase that prefers the more detailed/condensed views, especially when handling very large integration estates. Given this, we are updating the status of this RFE to Uncommitted Candidate.