Skip to Main Content
Integration


This is an IBM Automation portal for Integration products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Future consideration
Workspace App Connect
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 30, 2013

Request for improved out of the box scheduling functionality

Currently timer nodes only provide very limited scheduling functionalty.
Any complex scheduling requirement can be met only via custom coding or a integrating a third party scheduler.

Idea priority High
RFE ID 37610
RFE URL
RFE Product IBM App Connect Enterprise (formerly IBM Integration Bus)
  • Admin
    Ben Thompson
    Reply
    |
    Jul 26, 2021

    Idea / RFE Review. Apologies for the length of time this idea has been in the status of Uncommitted Candidate / Future Consideration. Although we have not yet managed to prioritise this feature, we absolutely still see value in this request. We will continue to monitor this idea for popularity. Status is maintained as Future Consideration.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 7, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Integration
    Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Connectivity and Integration
    Product - IBM Integration Bus (WebSphere Message Broker) - IIB

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 31, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 30, 2013

    Thanks for raising this requirement; and completely agreed on the utility here. We'll take this as a candidate item, although if you have any particular specification formats in mind (e.g. WS-Calendaring) then please do let us know through the RFE. Thanks!

  • Load older comments